These two actions are not as contradictory as they sound, because the actions are for different goals and can work well together.
Fencing
We usually put up fences alongside watercourses to keep livestock out of the water or along new hedges to protect growing saplings from grazing.
Crucially, when along watercourses, these fences should be a distance from the watercourse. Twenty metres or more would be great but is not always possible. They should be far enough away from the beck to allow an ungrazed ‘buffer’ of vegetation to develop along the riverbank – either naturally or 'helped' with tree and scrub planting.
This protects the river from agricultural runoff which is nutrient-rich and damaging to the water. It also prevents livestock from pooing in the river, churning up the riverbank, and creating too much sediment. Vegetation buffers also slow the flow of water during floods. We encourage the use of water troughs instead for livestock; these can be filled using solar pumps to bring water from the river to the fields.
Access to the river
Where there are footpaths by the river, fences must have gates and stiles and we will always promote more access to rivers and wet habitats where it is safe and sensible to do so.
What do we mean by access?
We wholeheartedly support access to the river for everyone. However, we do not support access to everywhere on the river for everyone.
Why? We want to give opportunities for everyone to experience the river in a way that is best for them , wherever they live and whatever community they come from. This may be walking , swimming, fishing, boating, cycling, on a school field trip, or through films or other art forms.
However, it must be appropriate and shouldn’t damage the river or its wildlife, nor put undue pressure on farmers or damage their livelihoods.
Currently, there are many places along the Eden where access could be improved without this damage, and by putting up fences and establishing buffers, we may even be able to increase this.